THE IMPLICATION RISK-IMPACT OF PROJECT ACCELERATION ON PAVEMENT RUNWAY

A Suraji¹, F Nugraheni¹, and T N Sulistyantoro^[1]*

¹ Master Civil Engineering, University Islam Indonesia, Yogyakarta, Indonesia

[1]^* Corresponding author’s email: tri.nugroho.sulistyantoro@uii.ac.id

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20885/icsbe.vol4.art27

ABSTRACT

The process of building a new Yogyakarta airport in Kulon Progo District or New Yogyakarta International Airport (NYIA) continues to accelerate. The document on the analysis of environmental impacts (Amdal) is still in the process of preparation. Airport development, has implications for productive land grabbing, settlement evictions, lost probability at the site plan and at the location of supporting infrastructure. In fact, there was no study on tsunami risk reduction in the formulation of environmental impact (Amdal), so there is no guarantee of safety. On the analysis of the risk probability in the pavement runway project is divided into five probabilities of risk for three samples. In calculating risk, it is divided into three project acceleration assumptions, namely the assumption of a duration of 50% or 7 weeks, 40% or 6 weeks and 25% or 4 weeks from normal duration 14 weeks. Risk probability is obtained from the probability of the event and the probability of the impact. The highest loss is in 4 weeks duration (25% assumption) where has a total loss 308,638,309.40 rupiahs. The smallest loss is in normal duration 14 weeks where has a total loss 108,444,489.74 rupiahs. the relationship between probability and project acceleration is found. Where, there is an increase in the probability of a duration of 4 weeks by 0.17459% and a decrease in the probability of a normal duration of 14 weeks by 0.0618%.

Keywords: risk impact, pavement runway, risk probability

REFERENCES

Project Management Institute 2013 A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge PMBOK Guide

Fisk, E.R. (1997). Construction Project Administration. Prentice all, New Jersey, USA

Kangari, R. (1995). ”Risk Management Perceptions and Trends of U.S. ] Construction.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management. ASCE. 121.

Al-Bahar, J.F. & Crandall, K.C. (1990). “Systematic Risk Management Approach for Construction project”. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management.ASCE. 161.

2014. Munier, Risk Management for Engineering Projects. Spain: Springer International Publishing Switzerland, 2014.
2015. S. Alizadeh and P.Moshashaei, “The Bowtie method in safety management system,” Sci. J. Rev., 2015.

Long and et al, “Delay and Cost Overruns in Vietnam Large Construction Project: A Comparison with Other Selected Countries Korean Society of Civil Engineering,” J. Civ. Eng., vol. 12, 2008.

Smith, R.G. & Bohn, C.M. (1999).”Small To Medium Contractor Contingency and Assumtion of Risk.” Journal of Construction Engineering and Management.ASCE. 125.

Kerzner, Harold, Ph.D. (1995). “Risk Management.” Project Management ; A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling, and Controling. Van Nostrand reinhold, USA.